EVENTS

You are here

Events

Title Date Author Time Event Body Research Area Topics File attachments Image
Round Table Discussion with a Delegation from Israel June 08, 2023 1100 hrs Round Table

The Delegation will be headed by Mr. Amir Peretz, Chairman of the Board, Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI), formerly Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister of Israel.

Amb. Sujan R. Chinoy, DG MP-IDSA will chair the session.

Venue: Boardroom # 104, First Floor

Report of Monday Morning Meeting “Takeaways from Prime Minister Modi’s Visits to Japan, Papua New Guinea, and Australia” May 29, 2023 Monday Morning Meeting

Dr. Arnab Dasgupta, Research Analyst, Manohar Parrikar IDSA, spoke on “Takeaways from Prime Minister Modi’s Visits to Japan, Papua New Guinea, and Australia” at the Monday Morning Meeting held on 29 May 2023. The Session was moderated by Mr. Om Prakash Das, Research Fellow at MP-IDSA. Ambassador Sujan R Chinoy, Director General, MP-IDSA, Maj Gen. (Dr.) Bipin Bakshi (Retd.), Deputy Director General, MP-IDSA and scholars of the Institute were in attendance.

Executive Summary

Prime Minister Narendra Modi's high-power diplomacy at the G-7 summit is to understand the developed world's perspective on global security challenges and the challenges of the Global South to act as a viable interlocutor to address these concerns through India’s G20 Presidency. A key outcome of the Quad Leader Summit is moving beyond the security function to development concerns such as connectivity and space cooperation.  The Prime Minister’s visit to the strategically significant Pacific Island countries and Prime Minister’s announcement of a 12 Point Action Plan to address developmental challenges are of particular significance at the 3rd Forum for India- Pacific Island Cooperation Summit.

Detailed Report

Mr. Om Prakash Das, Moderator, introduced the topic. He spoke about the significance of Prime Minister Narendra Modi attending the G7 Summit.  There were high expectations from the G7 Summit taking place amid the Russia -Ukraine War.  The Prime Minister's participation in the FIPIC Summit is noteworthy and in addressing the concerns of the Global South.  The Prime Minister’s visit to Australia is significant and diaspora plays an important role in strengthening India-Australia relations.

 Dr. Arnab Dasgupta outlined the structure of his presentation by posing key questions. What did Prime Minister Modi achieve with these visits? What are the key diplomatic takeaways, and do they serve India’s goals? What are the major steps needed to further foreign policy objectives?

 Dr Dasgupta discussed the significance of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to Japan at the invitation of Prime Minister Fumio Kishida in the G7 Hiroshima Summit.  The Prime Minister engaged G7 leaders bilaterally and multilaterally. Prime Minister Modi addressed Session 6, where he highlighted the multiple crises confronting the global community as the COVID 19 and Ukraine crises aggravated global food shortages, global health challenges arising from climate change and sustainable development.

Dr. Arnab Dasgupta highlighted the key takeaways of the G7 Summit. First, the inclusion of Global South in the G7 agenda and the call for the reform of the multilateral institutions. These institutions do not cater to the needs of the 21st Century. Dr. Dasgupta emphasised Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on the sidelines of the G7 Summit. The Prime Minister assured humanitarian aid to Ukraine and he stated that dialogue and diplomacy are the only way forward to resolve the conflicts.

 Dr. Dasgupta pointed out the key outcomes of the Quad Summit which was held on the sidelines of the Hiroshima Summit on May 20, 2023. The Quad Leaders’ Summit focused on stability and prosperity of the Indo-Pacific. Quad Leaders major initiatives are: first, the agency and   the centrality of the ASEAN, Pacific Islands Forum, and IORA will be preserved. Second, clean energy supply chain will be created for clean economic transition; third, reorientation of Quad vaccine partnership to health security partnership in order to contain the future Pandemics. Fourth, Quad infrastructure fellowship has been announced to create 1800 professionals in infrastructure field. Fifth, Quad leaders emphasized connectivity protecting the undersea cable networks.by creating a partnership for cable connectivity and resilience Sixth, an Open Radio Network is to be established in Palau, Sixth, Quad investment in emerging technologies will be done through various initiatives such as Quad joint partnership in software development and the Space Working Group.

Dr. Arnab   Dasgupta clarified about Quad expansion vs overreach debate. He cited the Foreign Secretary Vinay Mohan Kwatra as saying that the Quad Summit meeting on the sidelines of the G7 Summit in Japan and the canceling of the Summit in Australia did not undermine the Quad Summit as it does not have a formal institutional structure like NATO.  Quad exists as long as its members are willing to talk to each other as the Quad.

Dr. Arnab Dasgupta talked about the FIPIC Summit that was held on 22 -23 May 2023 in Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea under the leadership of Prime Minister James Marape and Prime Minister Modi. India has deep roots in the region many of the Pacific Islands have special diaspora connections and ancestry traced back to the Indian subcontinent. Dr. Dasgupta mentioned that China's inroads into the Pacific Islands are a cause of concern.  India has good intentions, but China has the money. India’s intangible economic footprint is deeper in the region. India’s outreach is in response to the needs of Pacific Island countries. Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced the 12 Point Action Plan for infrastructure development. India’s developmental expertise is indispensable in the areas of health, IT, solar and desalination projects, and small and medium enterprises infrastructure.

 Dr. Arnab Dasgupta analysed the last leg of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit which was to Australia. According to him, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Prime Minister of Australia, Anthony Albanese transformed India-Australia bilateral relations. Key outcomes of the visit include a comprehensive economic partnership agreement, future cooperation in the mining of the minerals, the migration and mobility agreement, and agreeing to share expertise in green and clean energy transitions. The mutual security interests of Australia and India are to secure a free and open Indo-Pacific and to address the challenges posed by China. 

Dr. Arnab Dasgupta concluded his presentation by identifying guideposts and significant inflection points with respect to foreign policy moves on Indo Pacific and the Global South, in particular Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s forthcoming visit to the US to comprehend President Biden’s approach to Indo Pacific, and his visit to France in July to ensure the continuation of Indo – French cooperation in the Indo Pacific.  The Prime Minister's  engagement with the world leaders can be understood as exercises to generate goodwill, which in turn would enable the conduct of the G20 Summit in a smooth, cordial, and fruitful manner.

Comments and Questions

Mr. Om Prakash Das invited the Director General, Ambassador Sujan R. Chinoy to give his comments.

Ambassador Chinoy shared his experience as an Indian Foreign Service officer who served in all three areas- Japan, Marshall Islands, and Australia. Ambassador Chinoy stated that India’s primary focus is on the Indian Ocean region and geographical distance need not be a factor in greater interaction with Pacific Islands.

Ambassador Chinoy expressed that there is ambiguity about whether China is to be considered part of Global South or not, and that whenever Chinese leader Xi Jinping speaks of leadership of developing countries there is a pushback from many developing countries on China’s ‘debt trap diplomacy’. Thus, India is not seeking ownership of Global South. India is the voice of the Global South.

 With regard to the Quad summit that was held on the sidelines of the G7 Summit in Japan Ambassador Chinoy pointed out that it was a successful meeting. The contours of Quad have changed from 2017 to 2021. It has raised the expectations of the world. The primary focus of the Quad is preventing supply chain disruption in the Indo-Pacific and preventing economic and military threats to the region. Quad leaders are to work on infrastructure, connectivity, space, undersea cables and are not just looking at the elephant in the room. Quad is looking for creating a new environment for development.

 Ambassador Sujan R. Chinoy highlighted that India’s presence in the Pacific Islands is not about matching Chinese capabilities. It is about serving India’s interests and keeping in mind the primary stakeholders, USA, China and Japan in the region. India’s presence is as a pro bono provider of public goods. Ambassador Chinoy shared his observations on India’s successful initiatives such as Information Technology Centers in Africa. Pacific Islands are difficult to visit and therefore, Singapore, which created a dedicated cadre of experts with the rank of Ambassadors who promoted Singapore’s vision abroad, is a worthy model to emulate in the Pacific Islands as well.

Dr. Dasgupta agreed with the views expressed by Ambassador Chinoy.  He further added that area specialists and language experts need to be chosen while engaging with the Pacific Island countries.

 Mr. Das invited the Deputy Director General to make his comments. Maj. Gen. (Dr.) Bipin Bakshi highlighted the G7 Summit held in Hiroshima. According to him Prime Minister Modi's visit to the Cenotaph and Peace Memorial Park had particular symbolism attached, as the Japanese were the only people hit by nuclear weapons. He also pointed out Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s emphasis on reform of the UN  Security Council.  Maj. Gen. (Dr.) Bipin Bakshi said the Prime Minister’s meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy reflects India’s emergence on the world stage as a mediator or peacemaker in resolving conflicts.  He emphasised that Prime Minister Narendra Modi's outreach was warranted as Pacific Island countries are very small but significant countries. He stated that the Quad CDS meeting was scheduled but was canceled due to technical reasons.

Dr. Dasgupta responded that the nuclear memorial evokes a visceral understanding of nuclear conflict beyond a logical and intellectual understanding of nuclear security.

Dr. Rajiv Nayan, Senior Research Associate, emphasised that the Pacific Island countries are recognising the cultural capital of India. Different schools of thought, concepts, and ideas on Vishvaguru need to be debated so that they can be better utilized as cultural capital in India’s diplomatic interaction with the rest of the world.

Gp. Capt. Rajiv Kumar Narang VM, (Retd) highlighted the context of Quad investment in strategic technologies. Dr. Dasgupta responded that indigenisation of technology has limits. India's best possible option is the joint development of technology.

Dr. Anand Kumar asked the speaker how Quad interactions create reactionary responses from China. How is it possible to reconcile dilemmas of security and economic engagement with China?

Dr. Dasgupta answered by noting that the key dynamic is not to shut out China, but to figure out how cooperation can be managed.

 After the senior scholars, research analysts, and interns of the institute enriched the discussion with questions and comments, Mr. Om Prakash Das concluded the session. 

Report prepared by Dr. Velpula  Ramanujam,  Research  Analyst, South East Asia  and  Oceania Centre, MP- IDSA.

Report on “The Unfolding Ethnic Conflict in Manipur” May 22, 2023 1030 to 1300 hrs Monday Morning Meeting

Dr. Pushpita Das, Research Fellow, Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (MP-IDSA), spoke on “The Unfolding Ethnic Conflict in Manipur” at the Monday Morning Meeting held on 22 May 2023. The session was moderated by Col. Gurinder Pal Singh, Research Fellow. Ambassador Sujan R. Chinoy, the Director General of MP-IDSA, Maj. Gen. (Dr.) Bipin Bakshi (Retd.), the Deputy Director General of MP-IDSA and scholars of the Institute were in attendance.

Executive Summary

The tribal dimension in the North Eastern socio-political landscape is one of the dominant issues. The flashpoint of Manipur is innately associated with the issue of tribal claims and aspirations. The supposedly disproportionate land holdings among theMeiteis, Kukis and Nagas have been the crux of the problem. This resentment has further been exacerbated by the migration of these communities into the hill and valley areas. The overlapping territorial claims by various militant organisations have caused mutual distrust and hostility amongst the communities which is exacerbated by corrupt and non- inclusive governance.  

Detailed report

Col. Gurinder Pal Singh began the meeting with a brief introduction about Dr. Pushpita Das.

Dr. Pushpita Das detailed the large scale ethnic violence witnessed in Manipur on 3 May 2023. The genesis of this violence could be traced back to a protest march organised by All Tribal Students Union of Manipur in headquarters of all the hill districts of Manipur. Initially a peaceful march, it turned violent when the Kuki militants allegedly attacked Meitei community members in Churachandpur district. In retaliation the Meitei community attacked Kukis in valley areas. In the aftermath of these violent ethnic conflicts more than 70 people were killed and more than 48,000 people were rendered displaced, along with large scale damage to infrastructure. Prompt action was taken by the government with suspension of internet, curfew was imposed and a shoot at site order was given.

The protest march was in response to a High Court judgement in April 2023. The High Court ordered the state government to send a recommendation for the inclusion of Meitei community in the Scheduled Tribe community. The Supreme Court has termed this judgement as ‘factually wrong’. The Meitei community has historically been demanding the inclusion in the Scheduled Tribe list. In 1995, the Meitei community was granted Other Backward Class (OBC) status. In 2012, the Scheduled Tribe Demand Committee of Manipur Valley was established and the demand for inclusion of the Meitei community in the Schedule Tribe category intensified. In 2013, the Union Government asked the state government to forward the recommendations for the inclusion of the said community in the Schedule Tribe list. The Manipur Government did not respond.

The issue has revived a decade later and again the state government has not replied to the Union Government’s call for recommendations. The Meitei tribal union filed a writ petition this year in the High Court asking the High Court to direct the state government to reply to the 2013 letter of the Union Ministry for Tribal Affairs.

A point of consideration is that both the Nagas and Kukis are against the inclusion of the Meitei community in the ST category. Kukis have simmering anger against the Meitei dominated state government. There are several decisions taken by the incumbent government which have been contested by the Kukis. Prominent among them is the issue of migration. After the military coup in Myanmar, rampant migration from Myanmar has created socio-economic issues. In response, the government has suspended the free movement regime, detained 400 illegal migrants from Myanmar and issued eviction notices. These strict government responses have attracted criticism from the Kuki community because the migrating people from Myanmar are of their own community of the ‘Kuki-Chin- Mizo’ tribe.

Another issue is ‘war on drugs’, a campaign started in 2017. The Kuki community dominates the business of illicit cultivation of poppy and the government’s crackdown, according to them, is directed against their community. As a result, large scale protests have ensued with intermittent violence. The state government considers these protests as motivated by Kuki militants and hence anti- government.

In 2016 as peace talk started, the Kukis expected that their demand for a separate Kukiland will be met. This demand has been dominating their agenda since the 1960s. The demand is in light of the animosity Kukis feel against Meitis and Nagas. The decade of 1990s witnessed a kind of ethnic cleansing of Nagas and Kukis. As a result, the demand for a separate Kukiland was intensified by Kuki militant groups. In 2008, two broad organisations subsumed all the Kuki militant groups, Kuki National Organisation and United Peoples Front. In 2016, it is these organisations with which the government started negotiations. The talks failed because of the lack of convergence in demand between the two groups.

In a larger context, Hill-Valley divide is the crux of the problem. Dr. Pushpita Das detailed the geographic and demographic landscape of both Hill and Valley areas. Further she explained that its Meiteis which from 53% of the population but inhabit only 10% of the land. Northern districts are occupied by Nagas which constitute 17% of the population while Kukis, which form 26% of the population are concentrated in the southern part of the state. This disproportionate spatial distribution of the Meities and tribals is the crux of the problem.

Dr. Das concluded by suggesting that if peace has to see its day, all the three communities will have to step back from their rigid demands and uncompromised stand. Government should be the first initiator and provide inclusive and efficient governance, rest will follow. Kukis need to reconsider their demand for greater Kukiland for more than one reason.  

Comments and Questions

The floor was opened for questions and comments. The Director General, Ambassador Sujan R. Chinoy, in his remarks, complimented the clarity and comprehensiveness of the presentation. He brought out the point that it’s not just the internal developments that have bearing on the internal security situation but it’s also about what’s happening in other neighbouring countries, in this case, Myanmar. He deplored the violent setback to the peace process that has been continuing for almost a decade. He pointed out the complexities in the implementation of Sixth Schedule. He also talked about the social mobility that has been witnessed in the demands of Meities for ST status over a period of time.

The Deputy Director General, Maj. Gen. (Dr.) Bipin Bakshi (Retd.) mentioned that Meities consider all non-Meiteis as outside their identity and society. He also referred to the Vaishnavite Meitei Kingdom and its influence in present days. Further, he pointed out the feeling of discrimination among Kukis where he mentioned that crackdown on poppy cultivation is not followed up with crackdown on its manufacturing and transportation which is being handled largely by Meiteis. He further pointed to the politician-police and smugglers nexus.

Dr. Rajiv Nayan commented on demographic composition of the Kuki community and their role in bureaucracy.

Mr. Anil Kamboj, Former Senior Fellow, IDSA, commented on the peculiar logistics arrangement in Manipur. He also alluded to the huge density of population in Meitei dominated valley (610-650 per sq. km) and miniscule density in hill areas (19-20 per sq. km). As per his view the restrictions on purchase of land should go away.

Mr. Niranjan Oak asked about the logic of Meiteis demanding Scheduled Tribe status when they already have OBC category. He also asked the prospects of Article 371 as a-succour for the problem.

Dr. Das mentioned that the Meiteis demands are centred on land and their ability to buy land in hill areas. The Eighth Schedule already provides sufficient safeguards for Meitei language. The need is to start acting on a peaceful path.

The Report has been prepared by Mr. Abhishek Verma, Research Analyst, Internal Security Centre.

Africa Day Roundtable on the theme “India's G20 Presidency: Furthering India-Africa Ties May 23, 2023 1100 to 1300 hrs Round Table





Programme [PDF]

Monday Morning Meeting on Al-Qaeda vs. ISIS: Competitive Extremism and Turf Wars May 15, 2023 Monday Morning Meeting

On 15 May 2023, Ms. Saman Ayesha Kidwai, Research Analyst, Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (MP-IDSA), spoke on "Al-Qaeda vs. ISIS: Competitive Extremism and Turf Wars" at the Monday Morning Meeting. Dr. Adil Rasheed, Research Fellow, MP- IDSA moderated the session. Scholars of the institute enriched the discussion.

Executive Summary

The presentation discussed the ideological, methodological and end state divergences between Al-Qaeda and ISIS, as well as their ongoing turf wars across various regions, mainly in West Asia, Africa, and the Af-Pak region. Even after their central leaderships have suffered major setbacks in recent times, both Salafi-jihadist groups are contesting for more territories in erstwhile failed states or failing states. In fact, it is the regional affiliates, which are now more active than the parent organisations. The conflict between the Taliban and the ISKP in the Af-Pak region is a disturbing development for South Asia and a cause of concern for India, necessitating strict monitoring and strategic planning.

Detailed Report

Ms. Kidwai initially laid out how Al-Qaeda has sought to position itself as an anti-Western and anti-imperialist organisation, intent on driving out all foreign troops from Muslim lands. AQ believes that Western-backed regimes in West Asia will become vulnerable to collapse after the foreign forces' expulsion, resulting in Islamic rule. As per the speaker, AQ has criticised ISIS' use of Takfiri, a theological worldview that allows the ex-communication of fellow Muslims while justifying violence against them.

She also pointed out that AQ has a broad, pan-Islamist concept of the Ummah and is willing to collaborate with non-conformists. At the same time, its affiliates' role in sustaining the parent organisation has been crucial for decades. Furthermore, AQ's position about creating a Caliphate is vague, and it seeks to gradually implement Sharia, in contrast to ISIS' doctrinal worldview. The latter prefers to implement Sharia in a top-down and oppressive manner.

She also spoke about AQ's evolution after an American drone strike neutralised Ayman al-Zawahiri last year. She said that ISIS, which assumes itself to be the true heir to Osama bin Laden's legacy, pursues the policy of hardline jihadism. As stated by Ms. Kidwai its administrative framework is highly centralised and considers the Caliphate's establishment as the end goal of its jihad. Moreover, unlike al-Qaeda, ISIS is unwilling to negotiate or compromise with non-conformists. It even perceives nationalism and nation-states to be anathema to its brand of Islam.

The speaker further highlighted how ISIS has primarily targeted its "near enemies," including Yazidis, Christians, Kurds, and most importantly, the Shiites, whom it decries as traitors to Islam. Additionally, it presents its Jihad versus Jihad waged by other rival groups such as Al-Qaeda as a battle "between puritanism versus populism."

The speaker underlined the various turf wars between the two rival terrorist organisations and their affiliates in Syria, Iraq, and Africa. However, she mainly focused on the developments in the Af-Pak region and the conflict between Islamic State in Khorasan Province (ISKP) and the AQ-backed Afghan Taliban due to their significance for India's regional and national security.

Ms. Kidwai, indicated that ISKP has exploited anti-Taliban sentiments among ethnic minorities and Afghan Salafists by positioning itself as their protector. ISKP has also presented itself as an inclusive alternative to the Pashtun-dominated Taliban. In light of this situation, the Taliban has adopted harsh tactics, including seizing livestock and property, arbitrary arrests, torture, and executions.

The speaker Also highlighted a notable difference between the two groups vis-à-vis the role of women. The Taliban has marginalised women entirely, whereas ISKP has employed women on the battlefield and utilised them for radicalisation and recruitment. She further observed that the Taliban has engaged with international actors, namely China and Russia, being cognisant of the importance of garnering diplomatic recognition.



Owing to the creation of two new ISIS modules; the role of ISKP in the Coimbatore and Mangaluru blasts; the reported connection of Popular Front of India with ISKP; multi-lingual propaganda materials, and the emerging nexus between ISKP, Laskar-e-Taiba, and ISI, Ms. Kidwai opined that ISIS should be considered an "emerging threat."

The speaker also underscored that despite the reduction in the magnitude of attacks AQ and ISIS (or any of their affiliates) can carry out, their ideological pull has proven resilient. Furthermore, the continued turf wars between ISIS and Al -Qaeda could potentially dilute the transnational jihadist movement, weakening its impact. However, she also highlighted that there also lies the possibility that in desperate situations, these terrorist outfits could carry out significant terror attacks to retain credibility and legitimacy within the militant Jihadist pole.

Q & A Session

Following the presentation, Dr. Rasheed opened the floor for questions. On the question of ways of preventing radicalisation in certain groups, Ms. Kidwai mentioned that no strategy or plan can be deemed "full-proof" against this menace but engaging with moderate actors within communities, particularly along with other already existing methods can counter the threat of radicalisation.

On the role of community members in preventing radicalisation, the speaker enumerated several instances where community members' contributions proved vital in addressing this security threat.

This report was prepared by Mr. Mohammed Shoaib Raza, Intern, Southeast Asia and Oceania Centre, MP-IDSA.

Report of Monday Morning Meeting on “Analysing China's Recent Foreign Engagements in the Context of Xi Jinping's 3 Global Initiatives” May 08, 2023 Monday Morning Meeting

On 8 May 2023, Dr. Prashant Kumar Singh of the East Asia Centre delivered a talk during the Monday Morning Meeting on “Analysing China's Recent Foreign Engagements in the Context of Xi Jinping's 3 Global Initiatives”. The meeting was moderated by Dr. MS Prathibha, Associate Fellow at MP-IDSA. Ambassador Sujan R. Chinoy, the Director General of MP-IDSA, Maj. Gen. (Dr.) Bipin Bakshi (Retd.), the Deputy Director General of MP-IDSA and scholars of the Institute were in attendance.

Executive summary

As the world emerged from the effects of COVID-19, China announced a new set of global initiatives: the Global Development Initiative (GDI), the Global Security Initiative (GSI) and the Global Civilization Initiative (GCI). These initiatives have different focus areas: the GDI on developmental finance and sustainable development goals, the GSI on security, and the GCI on ‘civilizational exchange’. However, as President Xi Jinping charts a more proactive diplomacy, there are concerns about the nature of China’s intentions in pursuing these initiatives. The talk by Dr. Singh analyses the promises and pitfalls the three global initiatives hold within, and what they mean for China’s neighbourhood and the world. It warns of China’s intentions to revise the world order in its favour, and encourages a reconsideration of India’s policy towards Chinese order-building and its contention for the leadership of the Global South. 

Detailed report

In her opening remarks, Dr. Prathibha introduced the topic by highlighting the flurry of diplomatic visits conducted by China’s Foreign Minister Qin Gang in the wake of the decisions taken during the 20th Central Party Congress. The centrepiece of these initiatives are the three Global Initiatives, which include the Global Development Initiative (GDI), the Global Security Initiative (GSI) and the Global Civilization Initiative (GCI). With this introduction, the Dr. Prathibha turned over the floor to Dr. Singh for his lecture.

The speaker began by pointing out that the topic under discussion would focus more broadly on the thought patterns of the Chinese policymaking elite rather than bilateral or multilateral relations. He identified certain developments as evidence of these patterns, as China gradually metamorphoses from a low-profile power to an incipient superpower seeking to achieve its goals in the international arena. China’s alternative diplomacy has been attracting attention from interested parties who are wary of US power and has also managed to gain acceptance from countries in the West. For instance, the AIIB and the SCO are particularly relevant in this context for their continued success in becoming alternative multilateral institutions. These initiatives are accompanied by a consistent push to redefine the global order on China’s terms.

In an effort to pursue these objectives, President Xi Jinping and other high-ranking leaders such as Wang Yi, have articulated the need to promote ‘Chinese wisdom’ on the international stage, a concept which purports to advance ‘Chinese solutions’ to global problems. ‘Chinese wisdom’ is the driving force behind the overarching frame that is articulated as ‘A Community with a Shared Future for Mankind’, and motivates the GDI, GSI and GCI. Dr. Singh argued that these initiatives are taking a comprehensive and holistic view of a new international order premised on the indivisibility of “foreign” and “domestic” in terms of development, and security and also in terms of co-existence of diverse social and political systems.

The Global Developmental Initiative (GDI), introduced in September 2021 at the 76th United Nations General Assembly meeting, is envisaged by China as an implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). Under the GDI, there are six objectives, eight focus areas and several deliverables. Thus far, the progress of the GDI has been mostly good, with nearly US$ 4 billion in investment in the Global Development and South-South Cooperation Funds, training and capacity-building programmes, and the membership of around 70 countries in the Group of Friends set up for the initiatives. However, the speaker pointed out that the GDI remained a state-led initiative to bolster the flagging Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), almost certainly devised to rid the latter of its negative image.  He also noted the issues with the GDI, with no tangible timelines, no clarity on funding sources and no tangible large-scale projects in the offing. Many recipient countries, which have benefited from the BRI, too, may not appreciate the change in focus as the big-ticket projects touted by the BRI are replaced by development finance, a more subtle form of economic assistance. As well, the international community is liable to be concerned, as the strategic communication surrounding the GDI touts China’s old lines of ‘development being the master key to every conflict’, conveniently ignoring the other political and geopolitical aspects of conflicts, strong opposition to human rights and liberal democracies and the linkage between the GDI and the Global Security Initiative.

Next, Dr. Singh focused on the GSI, introduced at the Boao Forum on Global Security in April 2022. The GSI has six key concepts, which are derived from China’s traditional diplomatic priorities, such as respect for territorial integrity and sovereignty. Flowing from these six priorities are 20 priority areas, ranging from nuclear security to regional institution building and peacekeeping, which are to be given attention through a host of platforms and mechanisms. The GSI, Dr. Singh argued, primarily serves as a projection of China’s views on security issues and issues that matter to the world. He highlighted China’s activities in the Horn of Africa, South Pacific and the Middle East as signals of a proactive policy, which may in turn herald China’s ‘peace activism at the global stage’, inserting itself into future conflicts as a mediator.  

Finally, the speaker discussed the GCI, the newest and the latest of the three initiatives. Introduced by General Secretary Xi at the World Political Parties Conference on the side-lines of the 20th CPC in March 2023, the GCI primarily revolves around the ‘Four Advocatings’: diversity of humanity and its political systems, the centrality of humanity, the privileging of inheritance and innovation, and people-to-people exchange. Initial reception, according to the speaker, was touted by the Chinese analysts as ‘good’. However, the initiative is yet to gain traction globally as there are only low-key pronouncements in the media and few scattered commentaries.

Dr. Singh argued that despite its best efforts, China has not succeeded in forging a common identity that could be shared with many countries. Chinese culture is a common civilizational identity in a few countries, therefore the difficulty of ensuring that its views would find a large audience remains to be seen. There is also popular resistance in many countries against the BRI, and there are also concerns about China’s irredentism, self-contradictory promotion of ethno-nationalistic policies overseas, and financial troubles regarding the BRI that are posing a challenge for Chinese diplomacy to navigate.

In summary, the speaker noted that Chinese diplomacy might be widely seen as an alternative to the US, but it is still going to experience its own share of successes and failures. He pointed to the need for other countries not only to shift and recalibrate their policies towards the new assertive China, but also to pay attention to its narratives. In the speaker’s view, global initiatives are often a form of strategic communication which signal intent and direction, thus pointing to the importance of understanding the role played by the phrasing used to delineate them.

Comments and questions

Dr. Prathibha opened the floor for comments and questions, which were led by the Director General, Amb. Sujan R. Chinoy. Ambassador Chinoy observed that China’s hostility towards the outside world represents a form of siege mentality which it has been unable to shake for millennia, and that the US has made significant blunders in hindsight by treating China as a country that could be rehabilitated to look like the US. The best example of this is the rules-based order, which China condemns as a Western imposition even as it profits from it. He also noted that China’s opinion in this regard matches India’s, the only difference being that India has been unable to design the alternative institutions that China has been able to carve out of the international order. Amb. Chinoy also noted that Chinese diplomacy now needs to be taken seriously. He also noted that the GDI is a vehicle designed to gain traction through its linkage with the SDGs, and the GSI brings into question the Western concept of ‘absolute security’. He then characterised the GCI, a challenge to the US-led Summit of Democracies, as most worthy of wariness, as it simultaneously justifies Chinese narratives and weakens the liberal order at the same time.

The Deputy Director-General, Maj.Gen. Bipin Bakshi, noted the need for a wary assessment of China’s new foreign policy, where it “plays peacemaker while stepping on its neighbours’ toes”. He pointed in particular to the Solomon Islands’ Security Agreement with China as an example of such a policy.

Commodore Anurag Bisen asked about how Indian policymakers should view the global initiatives, and how to square them with India’s own aspirations for leadership of the Global South. Dr. Singh answered by highlighting the tough choices face by India, as its aspirations, though similar to the ones articulated by China, must nevertheless remain its own; he advocated the continuation of current policy, where areas of commonality are worked on bilaterally, without a broader endorsement of Chinese policies.

The chair asked whether South Asia, especially disputes between India and Pakistan, might be covered by the GSI. Dr. Singh answered in the negative, but added that reinterpretation of the central principles of the GSI might make it so in the future.

The Report has been prepared by Dr. Arnab Dasgupta, Research Analyst, East Asia Centre.

Effective Communication in Policy Research May 04, 2023 Talk

Col. Vivek Chadha (Retd.), Senior Fellow, Military Affairs Centre (MP-IDSA), gave a talk
on “Effective Communication in Policy Research” on 4th May 2023. The session was attended by Maj. Gen. (Dr.) Bipin Bakshi (Retd.), Deputy Director General, MP-IDSA, and scholars of the Institute.

Executive Summary

The talk provided an overview of effective communication and highlighted key aspects that should be considered while communicating with readers and emphasised the significance of effective communication as a crucial link between the sender and receiver, and highlighted why it is important to     establish clear communication objectives.

Furthermore, the talk delved into some approaches that should be followed while communicating ideas, opinions or research findings. Additionally, it provided insights into some common pitfalls that researchers should avoid while conducting research and communicating with others. The talk also included a brief Q&A session to address some queries related to effective communication.

Detailed Report

The conversation began with an exploration of how concise and clear messages can be expressed using limited words, which is considered an art to be mastered over time. It was emphasised that the use of jargon in writing should be avoided if it is making things complicated to understand, which eventually defeats the purpose of communication.

Three key elements were identified for effective communication as a sender: reaching a specific audience to maximise understanding and relatability, maintaining clarity and avoiding ambiguity in thoughts, and conducting thorough fact-checking before presenting data or reports. It was emphasised  that the receiver should be able to clearly understand the message being conveyed, and it is equally important to appreciate what the receiver wants to know in order to establish a better connection with the audience.

The fundamentals of effective communication for a speaker were categorized into four broad questions. Firstly, it is essential to have a purpose or concept that provides value to the reader or listener, andbackground research should be conducted to avoid repetitive or summary-like content.

Secondly, understanding the audience is crucial, and different communication approaches are required depending on the type of writing. Policy makers, for example, may require concise summaries, while general audiences can be reached through various mediums such as websites, social media platforms, and other media outlets. Informed audiences may benefit from Issue Briefs or Policy Briefs, and for academic audiences, clear contributions should be made without unnecessary complexity. Clarity of intent was highlighted as an important aspect.

The third question addressed the approach to executing effective communication. It was stated that communication starts with a core idea and is supported by relevant data and facts from authoritative sources to enhance credibility. The "Idea to Fruition" process, consisting of defining the idea, deliberating and refining it through discussion with peers, engaging in critical analysis and dialogue, and developing it into a final product, was recommended.

As far as approach to verbal communication is, concerned, simplicity was emphasised to be kept in mind, Speakers were advised to prepare well, actively listen to the other side, and show empathy by understanding the perspectives of others and incorporating it into the conversation. Several pitfalls to be avoided were identified. Criticism should be presented in a balanced and constructive manner, considering the perspective of the other person. Understanding the needs and expectations of policy makers and aligning arguments with their work was deemed important. Speakers were also advised to stay within their area of expertise in digital formats like social media and to be cautious about the motives and agendas of web-based shows, as well as the target audience attracted to them.

Questions & Comments

Maj. Gen. (Dr.) Bipin Bakshi (Retd.) emphasised the importance of using 3-4 bullet points and small one-liners in presentation slides, avoiding long sentences. He mentioned that incorporating visuals such as graphs, maps, and figures can be highly effective. Additionally, he pointed out the advantage of staying updated with the discussion by synchronising with the presentation slides, in case one missed any part of the discussion

Gp. Capt. (Dr.) R. K. Narang (Retd.) made a query on the usage of only one or two languages, which in a way  makes viewership restricted.

Dr. Om Prakash Das asked about the balancing of vocabulary & language in communication if there is a  great variation in the type of viewership.

Dr. Arnab Dasgupta asked a question on how to rebuild a conversation with the intended audience if the earlier communication failed?

Ms. Mayuri Banerjee asked a question on the usage of journalistic and academic style of writing.

Dr. Jason Wahlang asked a question on usage of graphics illustrations in presentations.

In his response, Col. Chadha highlighted that the work on simultaneous translation in regional languages is currently going on and it is important to communicate your ideas in multiple languages that will help in more readership.

He also reiterated that it's always good to start with small targets and then ladder up gradually. With reference to the writing style he suggested using any style, only thing is it should not  restrict readers from understanding it. About the usage of graphics he said that graphics helps in connecting with the audience in a better way and also simplifies the understanding.

The Report has been prepared by Mr. Anit Kumar, Intern, Internal Security Centre, MP-IDSA.

Monday Morning Meeting on “Worsening Political Environment in Pakistan” May 01, 2023 Monday Morning Meeting

Dr. Ashok K. Behuria, Senior Fellow, Manohar Parrikar IDSA (MP-IDSA), spoke on “Worsening Political Environment in Pakistan” at the Monday Morning Meeting held on 01 May 2023. The session was moderated by Dr. Nazir Ahmad Mir, Research Assistant, MP-IDSA.  Maj. Gen. (Dr.) Bipin Bakshi (Retd.), Deputy Director General, MP-IDSA, and scholars of the Institute were in attendance.

Executive Summary

Pakistan’s political climate is deteriorating, yet again. The ouster of Prime Minister Imran Khan in April 2022 prompted a series of events that are driving the nation through multiple crises. The developments during the last 12 months are indicative of the political malaise that has affected Pakistan for the past seven decades. The ongoing row between the government and the judiciary over the issue of holding elections in Punjab in May has intensified the political crisis. The military establishment, which is figuratively referred to as the "umpire" in Pakistani politics, is to blame for this disarray because it has, over the years, undermined other institutions in order to maintain its hegemony in Pakistani power politics. What is worse is the division within various state institutions. The army and judiciary appear divided and are acting in partisan ways. The economy of Pakistan is in a state of free fall. Against this backdrop, Pakistan is in for long-term political instability and a chronic economic crisis.

Detailed Report

In his opening remarks, Dr. Nazir Ahmed Mir offered a brief overview of the current situation in Pakistan. He highlighted that the primary cause of the political unrest in Pakistan is due to the elite capture of state institutions resulting in multiple social and economic crises in the country. The elites are busy perpetuating their vested interests without bothering much about the state of crisis the country has been passing through. Dr. Nazir cited a recent UNDP report that indicated that the wealthiest 20 percent of Pakistanis owned close to 50 percent of the country's income. He emphasised that despite having to cope with numerous political, security, and economic challenges, Pakistan’s priorities have been misplaced.

Dr. Ashok Behuria began his presentation by stating that, the country has muddled its way through repeated economic and political turmoil in the past, defying the popular perception that it would collapse. In South Asia, he explained, Pakistan’s case is unique in the sense that it has an entrenched elite who have exploited different Articles in the 1973 Constitution (especially those amended by military dictators) derailing the process of democracy from time to time. General Zia amended the Constitution at will and introduced elements that are being used by the elites against one another affecting the smooth functioning of democracy in the country.  At the moment, the clauses introduced by Zia in Articles 62 1 f), 63, and Art 184(3) have led Pakistan through the ongoing political turmoil for the last decade. The two former clauses/articles were invoked to disqualify Nawaz Sharif and facilitate the rise of Imran Khan while 184(3) is being invoked by the Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) to turn the tide again in his favor by ensuring early elections. He said that both Imran and the government are sticking to their demands and making reconciliation impossible.

The army led by a new chief, Gen. Asim Munir has lost its control over both media and the judiciary and is not in a position to dictate the course of future politics. He is also not well disposed towards Imran and mutual suspicion characterises their approach towards each other. The tussle between the executive and the judiciary may lead to a constitutional deadlock if both these institutions do not stay within their limits. In such circumstances, Dr. Behuria said it is most likely that Pakistan would continue to be in a state of chronic turmoil. He indicated that the army chief was resorting to anti-India rhetoric which signals that he was trying to strengthen his position within the army and simultaneously it might be his own way of warming up to Imran Khan who is criticising the previous army chief for adopting a soft line on Kashmir. He believed that Imran Khan might win the coming elections and easily secure a majority on his own and given the support he is receiving from the people for his anti-army rhetoric, he might work towards securing civilian supremacy over the army. However, it was also probable that both the army chief and Imran might consider it wiser to strike a bargain and work together.

Comments and Questions

The floor was opened for questions and comments. The Deputy Director General, Maj. Gen. (Dr.) Bipin Bakshi (Retd.) pointed out that the anti-army rhetoric widely circulating on the internet today was never permitted earlier. He also questioned whether the present turmoil would prompt a genuine democratic transition in Pakistan. The scholars from the Institute contributed to a fruitful discussion. The discussion focused on an array of perspectives, from India's worries about the escalating disorder in the neighbourhood to the role of regional countries and perceptions of youth across Pakistan.

 

Report prepared by Ms. Sneha M, Research Analyst, South Asia Centre, MP-IDSA

Talk on "MP-IDSA and Policy Research" by Dr. Uttam K. Sinha and Dr. Ashok K. Behuria April 26, 2023 Talk

Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (MP-IDSA) organised  talks by Dr. Ashok K. Behuria, Senior Fellow, South Asia Centre, and Dr. Uttam K. Sinha, Senior Fellow, Non-Traditional and Security Centre on "MP-IDSA and Policy Research”  which were held on 26 April 2023. The talks were attended by the Associate Fellows, Research Analysts, Interns and other scholars of the Institute.

Executive Summary

The Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (MP-IDSA) is India's foremost think tank for advanced research in international relations, especially defence, strategic, and security issues. It provides training to civilian, military, and paramilitary officers of the Indian Government. It was established on 11 November 1965. The Senior Fellows of the Institute shared their experience in MP-IDSA and talked about its importance, and also offered their views on how to improve the quality of research at the Institute and spelled out the norms prevalent at the Institute pertaining to publication, media interaction etc. 

Detailed Report

Dr. Ashok Behuria started, by discussing the background against which IDSA was conceived soon after the India-China War in 1962. He said that after the 1962 debacle, it was felt necessary that there should be a think tank focusing on strategic issues in India, which would keep an eye on the changing geopolitics and suggest policy alternatives for decision-makers in the realms of foreign and security policy of the country.

Institutions like RAND Corporation and the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) were taken as models and finally, the Institute was established in November 1965. He quoted from the writings of Shri K. Subrahmanyam while discussing how MP-IDSA functioned during its initial days and emphasised that all the Institute’s scholars must read the article by K. Subrahmanyam on the Birth of IDSA.

He talked about the academic freedom that is fundamental to research at MP-IDSA and held that the freedom provided to the scholars should be used judiciously. Rather than criticising government policies, the job of the researchers is to provide a constructive critique of government policies and provide the policymakers with options and analyses of the prevalent strategic environment both in the neighborhood and at the global level.

He urged the scholars to be very careful about their study and said that the focus should be on providing solutions to India’s strategic challenges. He emphasised the importance primary sources while conducting research. He advised scholars not to use the name of either MP-IDSA or the Government of India while expressing their views unless they were mandated specifically to do so. Pointing to the rise in social-media participation by the youth these days, he said that while it was welcome to do so, the scholars must practice restraint while expressing their views and ought to stick to their areas of expertise.

Continuing the discussion, Dr. Uttam Sinha started with a question about how it had been working in a think tank like MP-IDSA. He said that it was essential to read K. Subrahmanyam’s article on the Birth of IDSA and said that when Shri Subrahmanyam was the director of IDSA he highlighted that we should always keep in mind where we are located and what is the function of the Institution. He held that criticism was an important part of research but it should always be constructive and enriching. He said that the scholars must remember that whatever they would write, especially through the MP-IDSA website or publications, would be read by the government, and therefore there has to be a fair degree of caution in what the scholars seek to express and how balanced their articulation is.

Dr. Behuria added that we should find a way to strengthen our audio-visual projection as well so that we can propagate our views through the YouTube channel which will project the Institute in a big way.

Dr. Uttam pointed out that language and communication were important and said that the scholars needed to find ways to better express themselves.   

Dr. Vishal Chandra, Research Fellow, shared his perspectives and said that one of the major responsibilities of the scholar was to try to simplify things for the reader and present her/his viewpoint in a very reader-friendly manner. He said that the scholars should identify the gaps in the existing discourse on a particular theme and then attempt her/his research on hitherto unexplored areas.

Dr. Sinha said that the role of MP-IDSA scholar was to sensitise the public on issues of national security which is the mandate of the Institute as per its MoU.

Mrs. Mayuri Banerjee, Research Analyst, commented that we should write in a way that we can publish our work and it is acceptable to a wider range of audience.

Dr. Rajorshi Roy, Associate Fellow, commented that in terms of speaking and writing skills, one needs to keep developing them over time.

Lastly, the speaker and the audience discussed the Institute’s interface with the media and how the scholars should carry themselves in media.

Report prepared by Mr. Karan Phular, Intern, Centre of Europe and Eurasia, MP-IDSA.

Monday Morning Meeting on “Integrating India’s Northeastern Region in the Backdrop of “Act East Policy” April 24, 2023 Monday Morning Meeting

Col. Gurinder Pal Singh, Research Fellow, Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (MP-IDSA), spoke on “Integrating India’s North East Region in the Backdrop of “Act East Policy” at the Monday Morning Meeting held on 24th April 2023. The session was moderated by Col. (Dr.) DPK Pillay,(Retd)., Research Fellow. Ambassador Sujan R. Chinoy, the Director General of MP-IDSA, Maj. Gen. (Dr.) Bipin Bakshi (Retd.), the Deputy Director General of MP-IDSA and scholars of the Institute were in attendance.

Executive Summary

Act East Policy is a key foreign policy that aims to further strengthen India’s relationship with the South East Asian region through three ‘Cs’- Commerce, Connectivity and Culture. In the process of establishing connect with the South East/Asia Pacific region, integration of India’s North Eastern Region can be understood as both a precondition for the success, as well as a desirable outcome of the said policy. The need is to develop a robust and comprehensive strategy towards this end through an integrated approach. Challenges remain multi-dimensional that include insurgency, Indian Insurgent Group (IIG) camps, arms trade, and other governance and administrative issues. In order to fully utilise the untapped potential of the North Eastern region, strategies and their effective implementation is paramount.

Detailed Report

Col. (Dr.) DPK Pillay (Retd.) began the meeting with a brief introduction about Col. Gurinder Pal Singh.

Col. Gurinder Pal Singh began his presentation by putting forth a brief outline of his presentation that emphasised the challenges faced while incorporating the North Eastern Region within the context of the “Act East Policy”, and to present strategies derived from the ‘Net Assessment Process’ to address these challenges effectively. Col. Singh proceeded by giving a brief historical background and evolution of the physical as well as political composition of North Eastern States. The nomenclature ‘seven sisters’ was eventually evolved to ‘Ashtlakshmi’ with the inclusion of Sikkim within North Eastern fold in 2002. The diverse demographic composition of North Eastern Region is riddled with division on tribal lines and heterogeneity, further complicated by the improper state border demarcation.

The speaker then dwelled on the Act East Policy, announced by the Prime Minister Narendra Modi during the East Asia Summit in Myanmar in November 2014. The policy not only entails economic or foreign policy orientation rather it exhibits political, strategic and cultural characteristics. It is due to its extreme significance that institutional mechanisms for dialogue and cooperation have been established. All these mechanisms have been directed towards and driven by three overarching C’s- Commerce, Connectivity and Culture.

He further discussed in greater detail six challenges facing the North East Region- Insurgency, Indian Insurgence Group (IIG) camps, illegal arms trade, AFSPA, Peace Accords and other aspects. The government’s action on this entire front has to some extent been encouraging but lots need to be done so as to further the integration process. 

He then took the presentation to a ‘Net Assessment’ phase where he explained in detail the formulation of strategies based on the problem statement emanating from the situation on ground. For instance, in this case, integration of North East Region is the overall objective. To proceed ahead, scanning various internal and external factors impacting the region is required. After the detailed assessment of the region, as well as government’s own strength, suitable strategies have to be crafted out. The strategy must be clearly illustrative of what actually it entails, without any ambiguity. He went on to use this formulation in problem statements from a diverse set of landscape ranging from Governance, Economic, Cultural and Social Development strategies.

Col. Singh concluded the presentation with some of the key recommendations across three different landscapes- Governance, Socio-political and Economic. Under Governance, he emphasised upon inclusive growth model, enhancement of trust, transparency and governance benefits reaching to the grass root level as drivers to integrate the region. In this regard, he recommended streamlining the land laws to overcome the complex traditional system. This will help in land acquisition, encourage private enterprises and resolve ownership aspects involving tribal groups and other stakeholders. One of the important aspects is to increase North East representation in North Eastern Council and Ministry of Development of North Eastern Region.

In socio-political domain, Col, Singh recommended tasking Civil Society organisations, and other local organisations for participative contribution towards project monitoring, executing and implementation of government schemes. Further, he recommended opening higher education institutes and centres of excellence to further hone the much needed bridge between the North East Region and rest of India. In the economic domain, trade induced industrialisation, investment in communication infrastructure, designating NER as a Special Economic Zone can lead to increased investment, export promotion, infrastructure and skill development. Further, enhancing human resources can lead to numerous socio-economic benefits including increased productivity, investment, innovation, social development, social cohesion and sustainable development.

Comments and Questions

Col. (Dr.) DPK Pillay complimented the comprehensive presentation. He agreed to the contention that the number of casualties due to insurgency have significantly gone down due to a certain designed strategy being followed by the Armed Forces and the Police. He illustrated the three pronged strategy followed to deal with North East problem. The strategy entails, end to all inter-state disputes by 2022, no interference in indigenous socio-cultural life of tribals and enhancing economic growth in the region. He further agreed with most of the recommendations made by Col. Singh in his presentation.

The floor was opened for questions and comments. The Director General, Ambassador Sujan R. Chinoy, the Deputy Director General, Maj. Gen. (Dr.) Bipin Bakshi (Retd.), and scholars of the Institute contributed to the discussion. In his remarks, Ambassador Chinoy emphasised on ‘national integration’ which is considered an important ongoing process. He believes that on the integration part India has done quite well, especially in the last few years. The period has witnessed resolution of unresolved boundary disputes between the states, forward movement, dialogues with various underground groups. Connectivity is another milestone achieved in the last few years in terms of construction of roads, highways, feeder connectivity and bridges. On the point of trade led development of the region, Ambassador Chinoy pointed out that trade needs proper transportation which under the “Act East Policy” is a problem as the Kaladan multi-model project, Tamu-Kalewa-Kalemyo project and other similar projects have been languishing for a long time. Airways led commerce is also not an option due to issues related to market connectivity and specific goods related problems.

Ambassador Chinoy further highlighted the need for mental acceptance and integration of North Eastern indigenously developed businesses which at the moment are dominated by West India. Lack of large scale industrialisation is notable too.

Col. Singh agreed with most of the observations brought forth by Amb. Chinoy and attributed most of the positive developments to ‘Political Will’.

Maj. Gen. (Dr.) Bipin Bakshi (Retd.) highlighted that Bangladesh (more specifically, Chittagong) forms the natural flow of the land. Hence cutting trees, mountains, terrains across north east for developmental purposes is not wholly sustainable. He further emphasised upon better diplomacy in terms of getting critical support from Bangladesh and Bhutan in tackling insurgency issues.

In response to Dr. Gulbin Sultana’s question regarding religious peace in the region, Col. Singh highlighted the Buddhist, Hindu and Christian circuit as an instrument to cater to the religious aspirations of the people.

In response to Dr. Smruti Pattanaik’s question on free movement regimes and free trade, Col. Singh highlighted that a lot more needs to be done to control and regulate the movement across the India-Myanmar Border.

Dr. Pushpita Das highlighted the traditional nature of tribal society as the crux of the problem. She stated that the need is to change the nature of society in order for development initiatives to percolate down to the grass-root level.

Col. Manish Rana pointed out the paradox of mixing economic and cultural integration. According to him, preservation of cultural uniqueness is more important than the resolve over cultural integration.

Mr. Jason Wahlang asked about the prospects of integration in the longer run in light of tribal-non tribal clashes witnessed in the North Eastern Region. Col. Singh asserted that there are multiple socio-political issues which certainly impact the prospects of integration. He cited the example of Citizenship Amendment Act that was misconstrued in North East as targeted against indigenous inhabitants, while a lot of minorities have benefited from the Act on the western borders.

Report prepared by Mr Abhishek Verma, Research Analyst, Internal Security Centre, MP-IDSA

Pages

Top